“Vor der Schippe ist es duster!”, is a German miners saying, meaning “It’s dark in front of the shovel.”
We have put some light there and now the image video of the centre is ready to be presented.
After some changes in the hosting of the DAADs website, finally the new image video of the Centre of Excellence for Mining, Environmental Engineering and Resource Management is also ready to be implemented in your website.
The videos maximum width is 640 pixel. Up to this size it will adjust automatically to different screen sizes (smart phone, laptop). You can choose between the original version in English, with English subtitles and with German subtitles.
If you need the video for a live presentation, please contact Sylvia Vogt or Dr. Dorothee Weyler in Bonn .They have different versions available for bigger screens and beamer.
As we know from the quantum mechanics is the influence from an observer on the observed subject growing with the intensity of the observation (more here: https://idw-online.de/de/news391). Filming without disturbing is therefore a very sensitive process and I hope we didn’t disturb too much and everyone will be happy to have left some traces for future scientists who will research how African Excellence made his steps to a strong scientific organisation.
During preparation and the filming I have to deal with a lot of organisational demands on the countries legal level, as well as structures directly around the Centre. Therefor I made some observations that I would like to share:
With some Centres I had difficulties to find the physical location of the Centre on the campus and where in town the campus is located (different branches). That means it is also hard for interested students to find the real location. A map or a little graphic of the campus could help here a lot.
A direct phone number to call, an email address, opening hours and a contact persons name would also make it more easy to get into touch with the Centre.
Many scientists still use free email services like “gmail” or “yahoo”. Since we all know that these services are paid by analysing and selling your data and content of your mails, it would be preferable that there is a firstname.lastname@example.org address for the Centers representatives.
My impressions of Kenya:
Kenya is getting more and more advanced. As a film crew we face some special procedures entering a country. In the first place we have to go through customs with a lot of electronic equipment and in the second place we need working and filming permits. Both has to be handled in Kenya by a Kenyan film company. This means it is decoupled from corruption and a regular process. Applications for a normal visa are handled online and processed in a few-hour, this is an amazing development for an African country. Entering a national park needs also an entrance fee (54 USD per person per day) that can only be paid by credit card – no more cash/corruption in this area too.
The only still existing problem are the police road blocks. Self-driving mzungu (white man) seem not to be so common in Kenya, so we had always been the one getting stopped. On our first roadblock, coming from Mombasa, we had been accompanied by an Kenyan driver from the university who finally solved the police issue with a “gift” of 500 KSE. Before that they had been desperately searching for something that could be wrong with our rental car, to get a reason for a fine. The police women at the road block before Voi asked straight forward what we can give to them. We solved the situation by offering a pack of biscuits. From that day onwards every filling up with petrol in Voi implicated bringing the police women at the road block some biscuits. That was ok with us and gave us even a nice chat every time we passed.
Summing it up:
Kenya is developing, but every step you do demands a decent amount of money for permits, entrance fees and expensive car rental prices (almost 6.000 USD in total for our short trip).
An impression from an outside observer about the Centres:
The idea of Prof. Jan Bongaerts, to put expertise together, so that the sum of all parts is more than the individual outcome, for me was a good idea for further development:
To invite the law specialists from Dar es Salaam to teach about mining law in the EAC, to cooperate with the Centre for Microfinance in Congo in the field of artisanal (small) mining and involving Namibians Centre logistic knowledge in teaching how a future mining adviser for an African government should incorporate logistics in his expertise.
One more thought:
By all enthusiasm for application-orientated knowledge, we still need people who make innovations and they must be educated and allowed to think beside the tracks.
And in the end it was a pleasure to see you all again!
Now you just copy the code that appears in the grey field and copy and paste it to your websites code, exactly at the place where you want the video to appear.
The video is now streamed from the african-excellence website into a so called “iframe” on your website. It is the same procedure as on YouTube, only that our version is responsive webdesign and adjusts to the size of the monitor, from mobile phones up to normal computer monitors.
The film doesn’t get larger than its original resolution of 640 pixels.
To make the videos about the centres and to accompany the network meeting in Ghana 2016 gave me a brief insight into the academic world of African-Excellence.
Since my daily business is to think about digital media in the modern world and how they can be effectively used, I started to think about what this German-African cooperation would need to be a vital academic discussion ground, a source of knowledge, a instrument to reach the world out there, a tool to publish, a knot to stay in contact and a place to be found if someone else needs the expertise of a colleague.
What I learned at the network meeting is, that it is not so easy to publish in the major well-known science magazines, since they are mostly America based and not really interested in African themes. Dr. Kenneth Odero from the Logistics Centre in Namibia countered:
” If we can not publish in their magazines, so let them come to the place where we publish, if they want to hear about our knowledge.”
Since the blog is now out and alive this is my first question:
1. Can this blog be a place for scientists to publish?
Please comment below and make your suggestions, what could be better and what is missing or why this is perhaps the wrong tool.
Prof. Paul Webb from the East and South African-German Centre talks about his work approach:
“In all of our research … that it is useable and makes an impact …”
2. Can this blog make an impact in the real world?
What would it need? How do you think could this be accomplished?
Life is moving on, so does people. Some of the well-educated alumni of the Centres vanish into their daily business. There is nothing bad about it, but their creative ideas and their rich knowledge base is lost for the academic discussion.
“Do you remember, there was a master thesis about this topic, do you remember the title of the thesis or the name of the student?” “Yes, I remember, he did some good research, but I just can not remember his name.” “Which year?” “Oh, quite a while ago.” …
3. Can this blog help to stay in contact, not to loose the tie to the academic discussion?
If a group of students wants to meet from time to time, they build a “WhatsApp group”. For mail people use Google Mail, Yahoo or AOL, we search with Google, phone with Skype, send our theses files with Dropbox and try to find the love of our life with Facebook. And now, while everyone is talking about the digital university, Microsoft is so kind to give us the perfect digital university tool – just for free.
All these services are more or less easy to use, everywhere available and the best of all, they are free. The only price we pay is that we have to send big loads of data to the American companies who offer the services.
In the private world this could perhaps be accepted, but what about science, knowledge, research and publications. Do you really want to give Google the power to decide whose ideas reach the world and who is banned from public. If Microsoft and their new cloud is getting all your lectures manuscripts in the new digital cloud university, who will then decide whose idea is whose and under which name the theses will finally be published? And is it then Google’s turn to help with the decision which scientist will reach a bigger audience?
What do you think? Will science in a digital world be more and more driven by economic interests of American internet companies? Do we need a tool which could give back the scientists the control over their ideas, their research outcome, their theses and the decision about, who is listening when they are engaged in an academic discussion with their colleagues. Or, do you think I’m to suspicious, this is all fine and we should be thankful for getting such wonderful tools which make our lives much easier?
4. Do we need to worry about data control in science? In case we have to worry, how should an all in one digital tool be, that covers the whole academic life and keeps the data under the control of the individual that uses it? Could this blog be seen as a small breadboard model for this?
This quote of the French filmmaker Jean-Luc Godard is, seen from a scientific background, everything else but the truth!
Since Immanuel Kant we know, that apperception is a function of our brain and to recognize the world, as it is “in-itself” is beyond our excellence. With the Austrian epistemologist Paul Feyerabend we could now shout out loud: Anything goes and there is no universal methodological rule! Karl Popper, another Austrian grumbler, would immediately jump in front of the camera, insisting: Yes, anything goes, just start with an arbitrary theory, but then my friend, you must do your homework and falsify with hard scientific proof, what looked in the beginning so nice and easy and felt like the final wisdom. Theodor W. Adorno climbs the stage, followed by his Frankfurt gang of brooders, and puts himself into the spotlight: Your whole perception of this film is blurred by the evil influence of the psycho-social-agencies in their totality, which are – you may not feel it by yourself – much stronger then your individual uniqueness. So if you are looking, maybe not for truth but for a better world – just change the institutions that formed you and with you your film. So what about the film? It will never be finished, if I have to wait for the institutions to change. Voices are raised, arguments hit the ceiling, ending in a positivism-dispute between Karl Popper and Theodor W. Adorno about what to do: fighting the total concept and ideology, that formed the film and the recipient, or as Popper would suggest: going picture by picture, frame by frame and looking for some truth by finding the lies in each image.
Making an image video for a Centre of Excellence always starts with a Paul Feyerabend feeling: Yes, anything goes! The imagination spreads its wings and creates a bright and colourful film idea, filled with humble truth and well-intentioned purpose.
In the preparation process Adorno starts creeping into the room and stands there with a bright smile on his face, as he observes my struggle with permissions, custom regulations, plane luggage limitations and all kind of organisational challenges, availabilities, not to talk about time and money limitations. It is not just the psycho-social-agencies, but as well the organisational agencies, beginning to form what – without having even started – will be possible. During filming I fight each moment with the spell of Immanuel Kant to find something – if not in general but at least for my own personal perception – that looks like it could be a unique moment – captured by the camera – of a little fragment of the “it is in-itself”.
Coming home with two hours of film footage for each Centre, the sorting and structuring process of the images seems interestingly to develop an underlying structure by itself. It is still chaos, but one could see the waves rolling on the ocean. The waves what you see, Adorno would reply, is the casting mould that was formed by the psycho-social-agencies and is now perceived as structure that individuals in a definite social-time-frame only could agree on. As I look up to my bookshelf Douglas R. Hofstadter is whispering: Yes, inside a system the system mostly makes sense, but don’t forget, there is a world outside your system. So editing, not only for a European but also for an African audience – that was probably formed by a different casting mould – needs a good amount of questioning my own assessment and perception.
The next step after the sorting process is to find the best statements of each interview partner. Here it is important to hear, what the members of the Centre qualify as a good and important statement, hoping that a deeper insight and a higher quantity of reviewers pushes objectivity and therefor the overall quality.
After that stage I have to choose part of statements that fit into the five minutes timeframe of the final video. The statements need a clear starting point and an on the spot end point and in most cases they have to offer the possibility to cut out breathing spaces and slips of tongue. In this stage it is interesting to see that I loose more and more the absolute control of the editing and the system and structure creates its own demands. When the first statement is in the edit the other statements base and relate to it. Is everything said about the structure of the Centre, for the rest of the participants this topic is out of question and I have to look for statements about visions and growth of the Centre. So, if in any case, what felt for you was your best moment in front of the camera, or even your whole interview in itself, is not in the final film, don’t blame me, it’s the system. It’s the fault of Adorno, Marcuse and even Walter Benjamin, who put the structures over the good intentions of the individual.
Yes Mr. Adorno, we learned our rules and act accordingly, putting good beans in one pot and the so called bad ones in the other, while Pavlov’s dog is standing on his box, drooling saliva on the polished floor of our scientific lab. What can we do, it’s not punk and our audience doesn’t expect some Dada poems, so we flow with the rivers flow, longing for an ocean of applause.
By the time the selected interview parts are put together, the gear-wheels of arguments mesh with a pleasant sound, but the car that drives us all the way to glory shines only in its greyish mechanical beauty. To make it worse – in contrast to what a scientist would call, the desire to show the objective truth – we add some music. Now the film drifts even more in the misty world of subjectivity. Sigmund Freud would have his pleasure, it’s time to feature the unconscious mind, the secret world of hidden dreams.
It seems, that we are far away of showing the truth, not in one picture and not at all in 24 pictures per second. But: “Ceci n’est pas une pipe”, the painter René Magritte would reply. This is not the thing itself. A picture of something should not be confused with the object it is showing. And art, if it hits the spot, is capable of beeing more then the sum of the little light spots illuminating a computer monitor.
So in the end I hope that, beyond all subjectivity, there is some truth in every picture and the final film – even if it’s only inside the psycho-social-agencies that cover the world of our expected audience.